War letters from the living dead man — A Reader’s Guide

(12 User reviews)   2759
Hatch, David Patterson (Spirit), 1846-1912, Barker, Elsa, 1869-1954 [Contributor] Project Gutenberg 2025 Not confirmed
Spiritualism; Spirit writings; World War, 1914-1918 -- Miscellanea Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 60,726
Reading time 265 min
Text sections 55

This digital edition of War letters from the living dead man — A Reader’s Guide is described by source-level measurements including 60,726 words, 4 hr 25 min estimated reading time, and 55 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 17.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Spiritualism,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Elsa Barker's automatic writings from a spirit called 'X' offer wartime reflections on astral beings, karma, and free will, blending spiritualist philosophy with World War I commentary.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

connected with the writing of that book, explained in some detail in the Introduction, which made any other hypothesis than that of genuine communication from the other world seem untenable to me. It began, for instance, some days before I knew in Paris that my friend had died on the Pacific coast of America.

In that first book of “X” I did not state who the writer was, not feeling at liberty to do so without the consent of his family; but in the Summer of 1914, while I was still living in Europe, a long interview with Mr. Bruce Hatch appeared in the _New York Sunday World_, in which he expressed the conviction that the “Letters” were genuine communications from his father, the late Judge David P. Hatch, of Los Angeles, California.

For the benefit of those who have not read the former book, I wish to say that “X” was not an ordinary man. He came nearer than any other Occidental of my acquaintance to that mastery of self and of life which has been called Adeptship.

After the “Letters” were finished in 1913, during a period of about two years I was conscious of the presence of “X” only on two or three occasions, when he wrote some brief advice in regard to my personal affairs.

On the fourth of February, 1915, in New York, I was suddenly made aware one day that “X” stood in the room and wished to write; but as always before, with one or two exceptions, I had not the remotest idea what he was going to say. He wrote as follows:

“When I come back and tell you the story of this war, as seen from the other side, you will know more than all the Chancelleries of the nations.”

This letter I confided to two friends who had been much interested in the former book, Mr. and Mrs. Vance Thompson; and it was arranged, with the cordial consent of “X,” that they should sit with me about once a week, to make a better “focus.” Their loyal faith was a great support to me during the first half of a trying labor.

The writing was not confined to the days when we three sat together; but about a third of the first half of the book was written in the presence and in the house of Mr. and Mrs. Thompson. Then they went to California, and I continued the work alone.

It may be of interest to some readers if I describe the process of this writing, which has changed gradually from a violent and mechanical seizure of the hand from the outside, as in the beginning of the first book, to a quiet impression on the mind within.

If the reader will imagine a well-known friend of vivid personality present with him, then subtract from that impression the seeing of the physical eye, leaving only the subtle vibration of the actual thinking and feeling presence, then add the indescribable “inner sight,” he may begin to realize how I know that “X” is in the room.

It is probable that Helen Keller knows when her friends are near her, and can tell one from the other, though she is deaf and blind.

When made aware of the presence of “X,” I take a pencil and a notebook, as any other amanuensis would, and by an effort of will, now easy from long practice, I still the activity of my objective mind, until there is no thought or shadow of a thought in it. Then into _the brain itself_ come the words, which flow out without conscious effort at the point of the pencil. It is exactly as if I heard the dictation with a single auditory instrument, like a small and very sensitive sphere, in the centre of the brain.

I never know at the beginning of a sentence how it will end. I never know whether the sentence I am writing will be the last or if two thousand words will follow it. I simply write on, in a state of voluntary negativity, until the impression of personality described above leaves suddenly. Then no more words come. The writing is at an end for that time.

The question will naturally arise in the mind of the skeptical reader (it has in mine), whether my own subconscious mind has not itself dictated the following “War Letters from the Living Dead Man,” in the attempt to explain a world tragedy which would have seemed impossible two years ago.

But from my long experience in writing for “X,” and from the fact that during two years I had not written for him except on two or three unimportant occasions, though often thinking of him, and from my acquired habit of minute observation of supernormal phenomena, I now feel safe in assuming that I _know the difference_ between the actual presence of “X” and my own imagination of him, my reminiscence of him, or even the suggestion of his presence from another’s mind.

No person who had had even a minute fraction of my occult experience could be more coldly critical of that experience than I am. I freely welcome every logical argument against the belief that these letters are what they purport to be; but placing those arguments in opposition to the evidence which I have of the genuineness of them, the affirmations outweigh the denials, and I accept them.

This evidence is too complex and much of it too personal to be even outlined here; but the Letter XXXVI, written one hour after the sinking of the _Lusitania_ and nine hours before I knew of it, is merely one incident out of dozens. Also it may be considered at least an interesting coincidence that at the very time I began writing this second book, three occult students, in different countries, wrote me that _they_ felt that “X” had come back and would write again through my hand. Since then several other persons have so expressed themselves by word or pen.

Many of the events of this war I myself have seen “astrally” at the time of their occurrence. I was a wide-awake astral participant in the first action in which the British army was engaged on the Continent, and related the experience to a British officer in England before it was reported there, my narrative being verified the following day by a French newspaper brought over from Paris by a friend.

I saw in New York the shelling of Scarborough at the hour when it occurred, and related the incident to a friend some hours before it was reported in the newspapers; though I did not know the name of the English coast town where I had seen the assault.

Nevertheless, I cannot read what is in the mind of “X” even when I am conscious that he is actually present in the room. I know only what he dictates, and have no idea how much or how little he knows. He has stated in one of the letters that he should tell me only what his judgment approved from time to time.

There is one point where I myself do not quite follow “X.” Sometimes when he says that the German people are so and so, had I been writing I should have said the Prussians. I have many German friends, and I cannot hold them individually accountable for the awful conditions into which their government has plunged the world.

I must emphasize that I do not assume personal responsibility for what “X” writes, but merely record his words.

It did not occur to me until several days after his last letter was written, on July 28th, that he had finished the war book exactly one year from the date of the first declaration of war, that of Austria against Serbia, and on the very day when the Pope sent out his great appeal for peace.

In his former writing, which began more than three years ago, “X” requested that I should never summon him, and later advised me not to ask questions. I have therefore generally refrained from doing either; though the temptation has often been great to ask him as to the final issue of this war by which I have been so profoundly affected. But I knew that such questioning might stimulate the action of my own objective mind and becloud my receptivity. I have recently shrunk from seeking for such answers even in my hypnogogic visions, lest I should see something which would make me less negative in the reception of these letters.

This situation seems to have cured me forever of curiosity; it has made me feel detached as a comet and almost as lonely, and strong enough to be willing to remain so. But, by a strange paradox, as my hatred for the brutalities of this war grew deeper and deeper, my love for all those struggling human souls _in every camp_ grew with it, until I came to feel that each one of all those millions who died and suffered on those battlefields was my brother and my friend. Love is a miracle that touches the brutal facts of life and makes them divine.

In the third letter of this book, dated March 10th, “X” said that the forces of good had overpowered the forces of evil and that peace would return to the world--though he did not say when. Before I learned of the _Lusitania_ sinking, but one hour after it had actually taken place, he wrote that the demons whom the workers out there had driven back had rallied and returned to the assault, and that he ought to have known that the very Law of Rhythm would drive them forward again after they had generated another supply of energy.

In the light of rhythmic law, that letter is to me the most interesting part of the book. It illustrates what he has said so often, that even the “living dead” do not know everything, and that the reason why they know so much more than we do is because they have a wider vision and a greater fund of data on which to base their conclusions.

In regard to that second onslaught of the powers of darkness, it is perhaps significant that the letter describing his first conversation with the “dark-veiled one” was written next before the _Lusitania_ letter.

Aside from his narrative, two major ideas seem to dominate “X” in this writing: the mystery of good and evil (love and hate), and the brotherhood of man.

Through his soul-challenging exposition of the conflict between good and evil, both in the human heart and in the universe, a man might learn to protect himself against his own evil as well as against the evil outside him.

In pursuit of this end “X” has revealed certain mysteries to which the attention of the common man has not heretofore been effectively called.

That there is an “astral world” permeating and extending beyond the world of dense matter has been stated in Theosophical and other literature; “X” makes his readers realize the fact. The astral world is said to be the world of feeling and desire; and it is through man’s astral, feeling or desire body, made of a tenuous kind of matter invisible to untrained eyes, that he connects with and functions in that world.

Within and beyond this again is said to be the thought world, and the theory is that man has also a thought body through which he contacts with and functions in it. And so on, plane after plane, till man reaches the formless and the universal, in other words pure divinity.

The evil astral beings described by “X” are beings dwelling in the astral world. Some of them have no physical bodies in the material world; others are the more or less independent astral selves of men, which during sleep go here and there in the world invisible to our open eyes. They have been active in this war.

There are also said to be beings of the elements, earth, air, fire and water, who are evolving along a line different from that of man. Some of these are amiable, some are malicious. Much information about these elementals can be found in the writings of Paracelsus. They also have been active in this war.

Other and superior beings work on all three planes, physical, astral and mental, and in still higher worlds beyond our cognizance. But for the beneficent activity of some of these, mankind would destroy itself or be destroyed.

“X” says that the feelings of hatred and the sufferings engendered by the great war have made the astral world at this time a very unpleasant place of sojourn. The purgatory of the Roman Catholics is the same thing as the place of post-mortem trial described by “X”. The Church has great knowledge.

Good and evil may be called opposite and complementary forces, one working in harmony with the Law of the Universe (otherwise called the will of God), the other working disharmoniously with that Law.

Some readers may be shocked by what “X” says of black magic. He is not writing to shock them, but to protect and instruct them. Superstition has been called the dark side of religion; but superstition is to be understood, not dismissed with the lifting of superior eyebrows. All things are to be understood. The great psychologists, scientists, do not now consider these subjects beneath their investigation. Refer to Professor William James, to Sir Oliver Lodge, to Dr. Baraduc. The names of recognized scientists who are now investigating occult phenomena would fill a small directory. When I admit that I am seeking to chart the unseen world, I am modestly enrolling myself in good company.

“X” speaks of the “dark-veiled one” who inspired Nietzsche in the misleading of young Germany. Perhaps behind every powerful man or woman whose work has told in the world there has been an invisible one, either light or dark-veiled. The question is not without interest, both practical and theoretical. Inspiration, like magic, may be either black or white.

The “voices” of Jeanne d’Arc would in our day be called clairaudient phenomena. History declares that they rendered her more, not less, efficient as the saviour of France. Martin Luther threw his ink-pot at “the devil”; but the Reformation was no less ably engineered because Luther had visions. Saul of Tarsus also had a vision, if we may credit the reporters.

“X” speaks of his own Teacher, a “Master.” When I compare the California Judge whom I knew with most of the men and women with whom I prattle about commonplaces, I do not find it difficult to admit the possibility that man may progress even further than “X,” given the resolution so to do. If “X” became what he was in a little less than seventy years, there is hope for us who look forward to eternity.

The second major idea of these “War Letters” seems to be the brotherhood of man.

The world has progressed thus far through a series of well-marked periods, and by means of a series of predominant races which stamped their time with their own peculiar color. “X” says that a new race, the Sixth Race so-called, is about to arise now in the United States.

If America would accept this idea as a working hypothesis--not another “_Deutschland über Alles_,” but say “America _for_ (not over) all”--she might build a peace-machine as Germany has built a war-machine. If she should go about it with the same thoroughness, postulating the ideal brotherhood as Germany has postulated world-dominion, she might make a demonstration in the next generation. In the mixture of races in America she has all the materials for any kind of spiritual experiment. Asia and Europe would look on with interest. England, Germany, and France, even Japan who is spiritual underneath and material only on the surface, perhaps Russia above all, would respect such an avowed purpose. It may be that the world will have suffered enough by the end of this war to be ready to welcome universal brotherhood.

Already there are movements in America which would gladly fall into line. “X” speaks of the Woodcraft movement, a loosely organized body of perhaps a hundred thousand men and boys and a few women, who in their playtime have gone back to Nature and the camp-fire for that fraternity which cities do not give.

“X” says that he has another service to perform in the future. I do not know what that service is, nor whether I have any part in it; but if he should one day declare to me that it was in connection with the Woodcraft purpose, I should not be surprised.

But after living for months with this war book, I cannot yet see it in perspective nor gauge its value. I give it to the world because it seems to belong to the world, and because among the thousand letters which I have received from the readers of “Letters From a Living Dead Man,” so many have asked for further writings of “X.” The first book is now being translated into four European languages, and other translations have been offered.

I want to thank all those persons in many countries who have written me so kindly about the book. It was more for them than for myself that I embraced the offered opportunity to hear what “X” had to say about the Great War. To receive genuine communications from the other world (assuming as I must that such communication is possible) involves sacrifice on the part of the amanuensis, even in the protected quiet of a country home. To do it in a great rushing city like New York, amidst the distractions of a complex social life, and during a war like this by whose horrors the “sensitive” is especially buffetted, and in a clashing pro-German pro-Allies environment, has been an education in self-control.

But the war cannot last forever, and some day joy will come back to the world.

_New York, Sept., 1915_. ELSA BARKER.

WAR LETTERS FROM THE LIVING DEAD MAN

IN a far away star I heard the command: “Go back to the earth, and learn the mysteries of love and hate.”

I did not know to what I was going, but went as commanded.

As I neared the earth an army of angry beings sought to bar my way. “What are you doing here?” they cried. “This is our field, and we brook no interference.”

I called to the Teacher, and he stood beside me. Even he was grave at the power of the forces before us.

“It has come,” the Teacher said; “it has come suddenly, after a long preparation.”

Wrath is a cosmic force, and hate is a cosmic force, and love is a cosmic force, and fear is a cosmic force. Did you think that love was a pretty sentiment? Did you think that hate was a mere annoyance? I have seen the sources of wrath and hate and love and fear, and that my experience may be of use in helping men to understand the forces working in and behind the race, I have made the effort to write for the world again.

This war is more than a war of men; it is more than a war of angels. Its roots are in Necessity itself.

A new race has to be born, and races like men are born in the pain and the blood of their predecessors. But as “the curse of Eve” came through her listening to the envious serpent of evil, so this curse has come upon the world through mankind’s listening to the suggestions of envy and hate from the forces of evil within and around the world.

I have seen those forces in forms, I have faced them and wrestled with them. I am strong because I have struggled.

I came back to the world nearly five weeks before war was declared on earth, but war was already declared in the spaces above the earth. As the nations had long been getting ready their forces, so the entities outside were ready and in arms. The demons who met me--for they were demons--had triumph in their eyes.

A beginning had been made, a seed of anger sown in the heart of Austria. And the seed was watered in the ground by those who felt that their harvest was approaching.

You must understand that evil is co-existent with good so long as the egos of men evolve. The forces of good and the forces of evil are complementary. They are in actual forms, they have acquired egos; their concentration on their work would shame the greatest geniuses among men.

But they too are consciously or unconsciously servants of that Cosmic Will whose designs we call the will of God.

Elsa Barker's War Letters from the Living Dead Man presents itself as a series of automatic writings channeled from a spirit identified as 'X,' an American judge and teacher of philosophy who died in 1914. The book's introduction explains that Barker began receiving communications days before learning of his death, a detail she offers as evidence of genuine otherworldly contact. The letters, dated from 1914 to 1915, address World War I from a spiritualist perspective, mixing astral travel, cosmic hierarchies, and moral lessons with observations on the conflict. Readers encounter a voice that claims to observe battlefields from beyond, describe 'Masters of Mind,' and interpret the war as a karmic reckoning. The text is dense with esoteric terminology and assumes familiarity with theosophical concepts, yet it also contains vivid, concrete imagery of war's spiritual dimensions.

The Voice from Beyond

The book's opening letters establish the narrator's identity and purpose. In 'The Return of X,' the spirit describes his transition to the afterlife and his continued interest in earthly affairs. Barker's introduction stresses that the writings began spontaneously, without her conscious intent, a claim that frames the entire work as a dictated document rather than a literary composition. The voice is authoritative, often pedagogical, and occasionally apologetic about its limitations: 'I rarely permit myself to prophesy,' it states in Letter XXVI, 'I only figure out the probable result of causes known to me.' This self-awareness lends a peculiar credibility to the narrative, even as it ventures into speculative metaphysics. The spirit's tone is consistently earnest, blending philosophical discourse with personal asides, as when it compares the unpredictability of human will to the charm of cats: 'A cat is a wilful erratic animal; so are many men.' Such moments humanize the disembodied speaker and invite the reader to treat the letters as genuine correspondence rather than fiction.

War as Spiritual Theater

The letters repeatedly frame World War I as a manifestation of cosmic forces. In 'A Master of Mind,' the spirit describes a 'great spiritual being' passing along the battle line, a being 'whose body is mind' and who works through thought alone. This being is credited with inspiring historical movements, such as the abolition of slavery and Columbus's voyage, and now intervenes to influence the war's outcome. The spirit explains that such beings calculate effects with 'celestial algebra,' but must account for the 'erratic element' of free will. Elsewhere, letters address 'astral monsters,' 'invisible enemies,' and 'black magic in America,' suggesting that the conflict has supernatural dimensions. The spirit interprets the war as a purgative process, a 'crucible' that will lead to a new brotherhood. These passages blend theosophical doctrine with contemporary events, creating a unique hybrid of war commentary and spiritual instruction. Readers unfamiliar with esoteric traditions may find the terminology dense, but the underlying moral framework—that suffering serves a higher purpose—is accessible.

The Mechanics of Channeling

Barker's role as scribe is both central and self-effacing. The introduction explains the circumstances of the automatic writing, but the letters themselves rarely acknowledge her presence. The spirit speaks directly to an implied human audience, often using the second person: 'You can do the same, if you let reason take the place of predilection.' This direct address creates an intimate, instructional tone, as if the reader is being personally tutored in spiritual law. The spirit also reflects on the process of communication, noting that it must 'impress' ideas upon 'chosen instruments' through 'contact with their naked minds.' This meta-commentary reinforces the book's claim to authenticity while also providing a framework for interpreting its content. The letters are dated and sometimes reference specific events, such as the sinking of the Lusitania, grounding the spiritual discourse in historical reality. For a first-time reader, paying attention to these dates and references can help situate the abstract teachings within the concrete context of the war.

A Reader's Approach to the Text

Given the book's unusual origin story and dense esoteric content, a first reading benefits from a flexible approach. The letters vary in length and focus; some are philosophical treatises, others are narrative accounts of astral journeys. Readers may find it helpful to read the introduction first, as it establishes the framework for the entire collection. The table of contents reveals a progression from personal messages to broader reflections on war and spirituality. Letter XXVI, 'A Master of Mind,' exemplifies the book's style: it begins with a specific event (a being passing along the battle line), expands into a discussion of cosmic law, and concludes with a meditation on free will. This pattern recurs throughout. The spirit's voice is consistent but not monotonous; it shifts between explanation, exhortation, and occasional prophecy. Because the text is presented as genuine communication, readers must decide how to engage with its claims—whether as spiritual literature, historical curiosity, or philosophical allegory. The book rewards patience and an openness to its unconventional premises.

War Letters from the Living Dead Man occupies a distinctive place in World War I literature, offering a perspective that is neither soldier's diary nor political analysis but rather a spiritualist's view of the conflict. Its value lies less in its factual content than in its representation of how some contemporaries sought meaning in the catastrophe. For readers interested in the intersection of war, religion, and popular occultism, this text provides a rich primary source. Approach it as a document of its time, and let the spirit's voice speak for itself.

Some nights I think about how Elsa Barker’s letters felt less like doctrine and more like someone thinking aloud across a great distance. That same patient voice came back to me recently while rereading the old Letters Exhibiting the Most Prominent Doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints — A Closer Reading. Both carry questions about will and consequence, asked softly, as if the answer matters only in the asking.

Luke Anderson
1 month ago

Madison Martinez
2 weeks ago

Gabriel Mitchell
1 week ago

Madison Lewis
1 week ago

Mila Young
1 month ago

4.5
4.5 out of 5 (12 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

How likely are you to recommend this book?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks