Main Currents in Nineteenth Century Literature - 2. The Romantic School in Germany — Text and Context

(0 User reviews)   2645
Brandes, Georg, 1842-1927, Morison, Mary [Translator], White, Diana (Translator), 1868-1950 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2014 Not confirmed
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- History and criticism; Naturalism in literature; Romanticism Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 119,838
Reading time 522 min
Text sections 13

For Main Currents in Nineteenth Century Literature - 2. The Romantic School in Germany — Text and Context, the stored edition analysis reports 119,838 words, 8 hr 42 min estimated reading time, and 13 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- History and criticism,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Georg Brandes examines German Romanticism through its key figures, tracing a shift from early idealism to later mysticism and psychological fragmentation, with close attention to narrative voice and structural contrasts.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

all that Herder had promised. To him man was not merely theoretically the last link in nature's chain; the men in his works were themselves natures; and in his scientific research he discerned with the eye of genius the universal laws of evolution. His own Ego was a microcosm, and produced the effect of such on the most discerning of his younger contemporaries. "Goethe and life are one," says Rahel. So profound was his insight into nature, so entirely was he a living protest against every supernatural belief, that he did what in him lay to deprive genius of its character of apparent incomprehensibility and contrariety to reason, by explaining (in his autobiography, _Wahrheit und Dichtung_) his own genius, the most profound and universal of the age, as a natural product developed by circumstances--thereby creating the type of literary criticism to which the Romanticists were strongly opposed.

From Goethe the young generation derived their theory of the rights and the importance of the great, free personality. He had always lived his own life, and had always lived it fully and freely. Without making any attack whatever on the existing conditions of society, he had remoulded, according to his own requirements, the social relations in which he found himself placed. He becomes the soul of the youthful and joyous court of Weimar, with the audacity of youth and genius drawing every one with him into a whirl of gaiety--fêtes, picnics, skating expeditions, masquerades--animated by a wild joy in nature, which is now "lightened," now "darkened" by love affairs of a more or less dubious character. Jean Paul writes to a friend that he can only describe the morals of Weimar to him by word of mouth. When we hear that even skating was a scandal to the worthy Philistines of that town, we are not surprised by old Wieland's ill-natured remark, that the circle in question appeared to him to be aiming at "brutalising animal nature." Thus it was that the sweet, refined coquette, Frau von Stein, became Goethe's muse for ten whole years, the original of Leonore and Iphigenia; and later he created a still greater scandal by taking into his house Christiane Vulpius (the young girl whose presence had become a necessity to him, and who, in spite of her faults, never embittered his life by making any demands upon him), and living with her for eighteen years before obtaining the sanction of the Church to their union.

Goethe's as well as Schiller's youthful works had been inspired by what the Germans call the "Freigeisterei" of passion, its demand for freedom, its instinct of revolt. Both breathe one and the same spirit, the spirit of defiance. Goethe's _Die Geschwister_ treats of the passion of brother for sister. The conclusion of _Stella_, in its original form, is a justification of bigamy; and Jean Paul, too, in his _Siebenkäs_, treats of bigamy as a thing perfectly permissible in the case of a genius to whom the first tie has become burdensome. _Götz_ represents the tragic fate of the man of genius who rises in revolt against a lukewarm and corrupt age. Schiller's _Die Räuber_, with its device _In Tyrannos_, and its motto from Hippocrates, "That which medicine cannot cure iron cures, and that which iron cannot cure fire cures," is a declaration of war against society. Karl Moor is the noble-hearted idealist, who in "the castrated century" is inevitably doomed to perish as a criminal. Schiller's robbers are not highwaymen, but revolutionaries. They do not plunder, but punish. They have separated themselves from society to revenge themselves upon it for the wrongs it has done them. Schiller's defiance is still more personally expressed in those poems of his first period which were written under the influence of his relations with Frau von Kalb, poems re-written and entirely altered in the later editions. In the one which ultimately received the title _Der Kampf_, but which was originally called _Freigeisterei der Leidenschaft_, he writes:--

"Woher dies Zittern, dies unnennbare Entsetzen, Wenn mich dein liebevoller Arm umschlang? Weil Dich ein Eid, den auch nur Wallungen verletzen, In fremde Fesseln zwang?

"Weil ein Gebrauch, den die Gesetze heilig prägen, Des Zufalls schwere Missethat geweiht? Nein--unerschrocken trotz ich einem Bund entgegen, Den die erröthende Natur bereut.

"O zittre nicht--Du hast als Sünderin geschworen, Ein Meineid ist der Reue fromme Pflicht, Das Herz war mein, das Du vor dem Altar verloren, Mit Menschenfreuden spielt der Himmel nicht."[1]

Georg Brandes opens his study of German Romanticism by acknowledging the difficulty a foreign critic faces: the subject is vast, the German literature already exhaustively detailed by native scholars. His solution is to lean on a personal standpoint and the “artistic faculty” of representation—a quality he finds rare among German critics. This self-aware positioning sets the tone for a work that is as much about method as about its subject. Brandes writes as a Dane observing German literary currents, and his outsider perspective yields observations on national character and literary form that a native critic might overlook.

The Foreign Critic’s Advantage

Brandes argues that a foreigner can detect “the mark of race” more easily than a German critic, who is too immersed to see it. This claim is not mere modesty; it shapes the entire volume. He contrasts the German critic’s exhaustive detail with his own emphasis on externalisation and artistic representation. The introduction frames the book as a deliberate act of cultural translation, where the critic’s distance becomes a tool for identifying patterns in voice and structure that might otherwise go unnoticed. Brandes’s own prose mirrors this: he moves swiftly from generalisation to specific example, keeping the narrative pace brisk even when dealing with dense philosophical material.

Hoffmann’s Fractured Selves

In his discussion of E.T.A. Hoffmann, Brandes zeroes in on the split between the judge by day and the fantasist by night. He quotes Hoffmann’s own description of being “at strife with my own Ego,” a phrase that captures the Romantic obsession with doubling and identity. The analysis of Die Elixire des Teufels dwells on the hero Medardus, whose voice dissolves into a stammering, mocking echo of itself. Brandes notes the “strange contrast” between Hoffmann’s official life and his literary one, but he does not reduce the fiction to biography. Instead, he shows how the narrative voice itself becomes unstable—Medardus cannot tell whether he is Viktorin or himself, and the text reproduces that confusion in its shifting pronouns and perspectives.

Pace and the Gothic Cadence

Brandes’s own pacing shifts markedly when he turns to Hoffmann. The earlier chapters move at a measured, analytical tempo; here, the prose accelerates into a breathless catalogue of horrors: “voluptuousness and horrors,” “carnal desires,” “crimes of every kind.” The excerpt from The Elixir of Satan is quoted at length, with its stammered “Me-dar-dus, Me-dar-dus” and the knocking that rises through the floor. Brandes lets the Gothic rhythm dominate, interrupting his own commentary with the raw text. This change in pace is deliberate: it mirrors the Romantic School’s own movement from philosophical idealism to a darker, more visceral mode. The critic’s voice recedes, and the fiction’s own cadence takes over, demonstrating how Romantic literature itself dictates the terms of its analysis.

Brandes’s volume rewards readers who attend to its own narrative voice as much as to the writers it discusses. The shifts in pace—from the measured introduction to the feverish Hoffmann section—are not accidental; they enact the very Romantic tension between control and dissolution that Brandes identifies. A reader alert to these structural choices will find the book as much a performance of criticism as a history of a school.

I’ve shelved Brandes’ Romantic School for decades, always struck by how its early idealism unravels into quiet fragments. There is a tender patience in watching a narrative voice lose itself. That same gentle probing of why we hold to stories lives in Why we should read-- — Edition Insights, a companion I keep nearby, its margins as worn as mine.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks